<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../src/tei.xsl"?>
<?xml-model href="../../Schema/syllabi.rnc" type="application/relax-ng-compact-syntax"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title><hi rendition="#times"><hi rendition="#italic">Paradise Lost</hi>: Selected
                        passages</hi></title>
                <respStmt>
                    <name xml:id="whalen">Robert Whalen</name>
                    <resp>Author</resp>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <date>Fall 2023</date>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <p/>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <tagsDecl>
                <rendition xml:id="italic" scheme="css">font-style:italic;</rendition>
                <rendition xml:id="plain" scheme="css">text-decoration:none;</rendition>
                <rendition xml:id="sc" scheme="css">font-variant:small-caps;</rendition>
                <rendition xml:id="center" scheme="css">text-align:center;</rendition>
                <rendition xml:id="bold" scheme="css">font-weight:bold;</rendition>
                <rendition xml:id="times" scheme="css">font-family:times-new-roman;</rendition>
            <rendition xml:id="large" scheme="css">font-size: 125%;</rendition></tagsDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div rendition="#times #plain">
                <head>Council in Hell (Book 2)</head>
                <p rendition="#times">Recall that at the end of Book 1 Satan and his fellow rebels
                    build a palace in Hell called Pandemonium. In Book 2, they gather to discuss
                    their options&#x2014;which are pretty limited, given that no matter what they
                    do, they are damned for all eternity to suffer separation from God and
                    everlasting Hell-fire. On this last point, however, we must consider Satan’s
                    confession (at 4.73-75) that Hell is none other than anyplace Satan is:</p>
                <lg>
                    <l>Me miserable! which way shall I fly</l>
                    <l>Infinite wrath, and infinite despair?</l>
                    <l>Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell &#x2026;</l>
                </lg>
                <p rendition="#times">The Council in Hell, which takes the form of several speeches
                    by prominent devils, resembles something like stump speeches during a
                    presidential primary: all candidates are of the same party, but the party is
                    trying to decide (a) which is the best policy, and (b) who is most fit to lead
                    them.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">We need not spend much time on this, but here is a brief
                    summary of the various positions:</p>
                <p rendition="#times"><hi rendition="#bold">Moloch</hi> (2.40-105): open war, utter
                    defiance, for we have nothing to lose; and perhaps the deity, his anger roused
                    even more, might annihilate us and thus end our suffering.</p>
                <p rendition="#times"><hi rendition="#bold">Belial</hi> (2.108-225): more cautious;
                    revenge is impossible (because God, after all, is omnipotent and omniscient);
                    nor is suicidal annihilation attractive because even suffering is better than
                    total loss of self; so do nothing, and hope either that God will relieve our
                    suffering after a time, or that we'll get used to it, for if we retaliate, He
                    might increase our suffering.</p>
                <p rendition="#times"><hi rendition="#bold">Mammon</hi> (2.227-91): exult in Hell,
                    own our lot proudly; prefer “Hard liberty before the easy yoke / Of servile
                    Pomp” (256-57).</p>
                <p rendition="#times"><hi rendition="#bold">Beelzebub</hi> (2.299-377): spoil God’s
                    plans to create “some new race call’d <hi rendition="#italic">Man</hi>” (348).
                    “This,” he says, “would surpass / Common revenge, and interrupt his joy” (371).
                    Thus we have Milton’s vision of the animating motive for the Fall of Man: the
                    desire to ease one’s own suffering by making miserable someone else.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">The question then becomes, says Beelzebub, “whom shall we send
                    / In search of this new world, whom shall we find / Sufficient?” (402-04). Who
                    else? Satan, of course, “whom now transcendent glory rais’d / Above his fellows,
                    with <hi rendition="#italic">Monarchal</hi> pride” (427-28). Note Milton’s
                    word-choice here.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">Satan’s departure is followed by a lengthy description of what
                    the devils do to pass the time while waiting for their leader to return
                    (506-627). Identify one of these activities and comment on why you find it
                    interesting or perhaps appropriate.</p>
            </div>
            <div rendition="#times #plain">
                <head>Origin Story 1: Satan, Sin, and Death (Book 2)</head>
                <p rendition="#times">On his journey out of Hell and toward the newly-created world,
                    Satan encounters two strange creatures and discovers something about himself
                    he’d long forgotten. This episode, lines 647-870, is a demonic parody of the
                    Trinity, the Christian doctrine according to which the godhead consists of three
                    parts, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It is also, from a literary perspective, an
                    allegory: a narrative whose characters represent some other set of persons or,
                    as here, abstractions. Sin and Death clearly qualify as allegorical figures. As
                    for Satan, it all depends on whether he is to be regarded as a distinct and
                    autonomous entity, or as the embodiment of the ultimate form of rebellion in
                    Milton’s universe: a mere creature’s rejection of the Creator’s sovereignty.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">Read this episode (<ref rendition="#plain"
                        target="../Audio/Milton/2.647-870.mp3">2.647-870</ref>), then comment on
                    aspects and/or specific passages you find most striking.</p>
            </div>
            <div rendition="#times #plain">
                <head>Eve, Adam, and Eden (Book 4)</head>
                <p rendition="#times">Book 3, the Council in Heaven, mirrors Book 2’s Council in
                    Hell. Here we are introduced to God’s answer to Satan’s plan: not to stop him
                    (because doing so would be to deny a creature’s freedom and therefore worse than
                    anything that could result from that creature’s choice, however disastrous); but
                    rather to use the Fall of Man as an opportunity to exercise mercy through the
                    saving grace of the Son (i.e. Jesus, whose sacrificial death redeems mankind
                    from its manifold sin and depravity).</p>
                <p rendition="#times">The above is an oversimplification, but there you have it:
                    Whalen’s summary of Milton’s version of <hi rendition="#italic">felix
                    culpa</hi>, literally the “fortunate fall” or “happy fall”. Originating in St.
                    Augustine, this is the doctrine according to which evil is explained as part of
                    a grand plan (or experiment?) that includes the existence of free will in a
                    world created as perfect by a wholly benevolent, merciful, and loving God.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">We are introduced to the unfallen or “prelapsarian” version of
                    that world in Book 4. Read the following passages, then choose one and offer
                    commentary in response:</p>
                <list type="bulleted">
                    <item><ref rendition="#plain" target="../Audio/Milton/4.288-318.mp3"
                            >4.288-318</ref> (description of Adam and Eve)</item>
                    <item><ref rendition="#plain" target="../Audio/Milton/4.357-92.mp3"
                            >4.357-92</ref> (Satan’s reaction upon seeing them)</item>
                    <item><ref rendition="#plain" target="../Audio/Milton/4.410-39.mp3"
                            >4.410-39</ref> (Adam speaks to Eve)</item>
                </list>
            </div>
            <div rendition="#times #plain">
                <head>Origin Story 2: Eve (Book 4)</head>
                <p rendition="#times">Eve’s first words to Adam include a recollection of her
                    earliest conscious moments: <ref rendition="#plain"
                        target="../Audio/Milton/4.440-91.mp3">4.440-91</ref>. Of which mythical
                    story does this remind us and why is it appropriate? What else do you notice
                    about this haunting moment? Other thoughts/comments?</p>
            </div>
            <div rendition="#times #plain">
                <head>Eve’s Dream, Adam’s Reply (Book 5)</head>
                <p rendition="#times">Towards the end of Book 4, Satan disguises himself as a toad
                    and whispers a dream into Eve’s ear as she sleeps (4.797-809). Caught in the act
                    by Ithuriel, one of Eden’s guardian angels, Satan nevertheless succeeds in
                    planting in Eve’s “fancy” (a Renaissance term for “imagination”) a suggestive
                    vision.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">Upon waking at the beginning of Book 5, she relates that
                    vision to Adam: <ref rendition="#plain" target="../Audio/Milton/5.28-93.mp3"
                        >5.28-93</ref>. Analyze and comment on this passage, then examine and
                    analyze Adam’s response at <ref rendition="#plain"
                        target="../Audio/Milton/5.95-135.mp3">5.95-135</ref>.</p>
                <p rendition="#times">We’ve covered much ground today, but not nearly as much as I
                    would like. So much Milton, so little time! Still, I would be remiss if I did
                    not give you an opportunity to select a passage or two for its sheer poetic
                    beauty and comment on what you find most striking and why. Any passage cited
                    above is fine, but feel free to choose one we’ve not discussed.</p>
            </div>

            <closer rendition="#times">&#169;Robert Whalen, 2023</closer>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>
