1. Introduction: Good Great
Books
This course introduces students to works from several historical
periods and in several genres: short story, novel, frame narrative, tragedy, comedy,
and lyric. The course’s primary objective is to develop students’ latent critical
skills through communal engagement with writing that itself engages critically with
the world.
2. Bulletin Description
“An exploration of a variety of books from the past and present
for the general reader. Reading and discussing ideas from books with insights into
human experiences are emphasized.”
3. Objectives
Students (1) will learn to think and write cogently about a
variety of human issues and problems as embodied by a modest selection of literary
works; and (2) be able to distinguish among the generic features, themes,
characters, titles, and authors of six major works of literature. The primary
objective, however, is (3) to spend as much time as possible in the company of great
writers.
Evaluation of progress toward fulfillment of objectives one and
three, as well as partial fulfillment of objective two, is based on extensive and
sustained participation in discussion forums, across six phases, as follows:
- Phase one: responding to three discussion
prompts, which address a variety of human issues and questions about central
characters in three Alice Munro stories, students will demonstrate their
engagement with the same by writing a minimum of 600 words (200 per prompt). In
addition, students will demonstrate their ability to process and constructively
comment on other students’ views by responding to at least two students per
prompt (100 words per student for an additional 600 words).
- Phase two: responding to a lecture and
four discussion prompts, which address a variety of human issues and questions
about central characters in Beloved, a novel by Toni
Morrison, students will demonstrate their engagement with the same by writing a
minimum of 800 words (200 per prompt). In addition, students will demonstrate
their ability to process and constructively comment on other students’ views by
responding to at least two students per prompt (100 words per student for an
additional 800 words).
- Phase three: responding to a lecture and
four discussion prompts, which address a variety of human issues as well as
questions about narrative reliability and conflicting perspectives in two of
Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, students will
demonstrate their engagement with the same by writing a minimum of 800 words
(200 per prompt). In addition, students will demonstrate their ability to
process and constructively comment on other students’ views by responding to at
least two students per prompt (100 words per student for an additional 800
words).
- Phase four: responding to a lecture and
four discussion prompts, which address a variety of human issues as presented in
Shakespeare’s greatest tragedy, King Lear—including
but not limited to the meaning and value of suffering and the role of patriarchy
in familial and political institutions—students will demonstrate their
engagement with the same by writing a minimum of 800 words (200 per prompt). In
addition, students will demonstrate their ability to process and constructively
comment on other students’ views by responding to at least two students per
prompt (100 words per student for an additional 800 words).
- Phase five: responding to a lecture and
four discussion prompts, which address a variety of human issues as presented in
Aphra Behn’s entertaining and disturbing “problem-comedy,” The Rover—focusing especially on the intersection of marriage,
money, sex, and patriarchy, but also the conventions and limitations of romantic
comedy—students will demonstrate their engagement with the same by writing a
minimum of 800 words (200 per prompt). In addition, students will demonstrate
their ability to process and constructively comment on other students’ views by
responding to at least two students per prompt (100 words per student for an
additional 800 words).
- Phase six: responding to a lecture and
three discussion prompts, students will engage in detail with poetry and poetics
(imagery, metaphor, forms of repetition and other sound effects), as well as the
human experiences and physical descriptions as imagined by one of our greatest
living poets, Alice Oswald. Students will write a minimum of 600 words (200 per
prompt). In addition, students will demonstrate their ability to process and
constructively comment on other students’ views by responding to at least two
students per prompt (100 words per student for an additional 600 words).
Evaluation of progress toward additional fulfillment of objective two
is based on a final exam (see below). Progress toward fulfillment of objective three
is measured by participation frequency: failure to participate in a discussion forum
will result in a grade of zero for that forum.
4. Class Participation
This is an asynchronous web class, meaning that the class does not meet
at some scheduled time. However, there are deadlines (every Tuesday and Thursday),
and regular and fully engaged participation is required. But you may submit your
work at any time prior to the deadline.
Each of the 22 discussion forums, spread over fourteen weeks, is worth
3% of the final grade, for a total of 66%.
See Discussion Forum Guidelines for a detailed scheme and the course Schedule for deadlines.
5. Final Exam
The final exam, worth 34% of the final grade, consists of two
parts:
- a multiple choice and true/false quiz, testing students’
ability to distinguish among the titles, authors, characters, themes, and
generic features of the various works (16%)
- a brief essay response to one of several options, testing
each student’s ability to think and write about a human concern or issue,
related to the course material, that they find most salient or compelling
(18%)
6. Required Texts
Students must acquire these texts.
No exceptions. This will ensure that reference to
the readings is consistent and understood by all. All titles, excepting Chaucer, are
available through the NMU Bookstore.
- Munro, Alice. Friend of My
Youth. Vintage/Random House, 1991. (ISBN 13: 9780679729570)
- Morrison, Toni. Beloved. New
York: Vintage, 2004. (ISBN 13: 9781400033416)
- Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury
Tales (available for free here).
- Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed.
Grace Ioppola. New York: Norton, 2025. (ISBN 13: 9780393926644)
- Behn, Aphra. The Rover. 2nd ed. Ed.
Anne Russell. Peterborough, ON: Broadview P, 1999. (ISBN 13: 9781551112145)
- Oswald, Alice. Falling Awake. New
York: Norton, 2016. (ISBN 13: 9780393355451)
7. Grading Scheme
The total course grade consists of participation in discussion
forums as specified in the Guidelines, and the final exam as
described above:
| • Discussion Forums |
66% |
| • Final Exam |
34% |
In evaluating student work, I will use the following system:
| 90-100% |
A |
|
64-67% |
C |
| 84-89% |
A- |
|
60-63% |
C- |
| 80-83% |
B+ |
|
58-59% |
D+ |
| 74-79% |
B |
|
54-57% |
D |
| 70-73% |
B- |
|
50-53% |
D- |
| 68-69% |
C+ |
|
0-50% |
F |
8. Plagiarism
2.2.3: Academic Dishonesty (penalty: not less than disciplinary
probation; not more than expulsion). This regulation does not preclude an academic
penalty imposed by an instructor as provided for in Student Rights and
Responsibilities, Section 1.2.3.
.02: No students shall submit as their own to an instructor any
work which contains ideas or materials taken from another without full
acknowledgement of the author and the source.
.03: No students shall submit as their own any work or assignment
which contains content falsified by the student or content the student knows to be
false.
.06: No students shall knowingly participate in, or otherwise
facilitate, the academic dishonesty, as described above, of another student.
9. Americans with Disabilities (ADA)
If you have a need for disability-related accommodations or
services, please inform the Coordinator of Disability Services in the Disability
Services office by: coming into the office at 2001 C.B. Hedgecock; calling 227-1700,
or emailing disserv@nmu.edu. Reasonable and effective accommodations and services will be
provided to students if requests are made in a timely manner, with appropriate
documentation, in accordance with federal, state and University guidelines.